↓ Skip to main content

Immunological Perturbation of Craniofacial Morphogenesis in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Kōkūbyō Gakkai zasshi The Journal of the Stomatological Society Japan, January 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunological Perturbation of Craniofacial Morphogenesis in vitro
Published in
Kōkūbyō Gakkai zasshi The Journal of the Stomatological Society Japan, January 1987
DOI 10.5357/koubyou.54.37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soh-Ichi Ogou

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Kōkūbyō Gakkai zasshi The Journal of the Stomatological Society Japan
#3
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,507
of 44,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kōkūbyō Gakkai zasshi The Journal of the Stomatological Society Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 44 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them