↓ Skip to main content

教育学における論理の問題

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
教育学における論理の問題
Published in
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association, April 2018
DOI 10.11555/taikaip.21.0_8
Authors

上田 薫, 鈴木 順子

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association
#8
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,073
of 341,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.