You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The First Report of Acherontia lachesis (F.) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) Infestation on Tobacco in Oyama, Tochigi Prefecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1303/jjaez.2011.65 |
| Authors |
Toshihiro Imai, Yoshihiro Kasaishi, Haruyasu Harada, Ryota Takahashi, Keiko Kuramochi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#25
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,184
of 182,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them