↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of miki (a traditional beverage in Amami Island)

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of miki (a traditional beverage in Amami Island)
Published in
JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN, January 2010
DOI 10.6013/jbrewsocjapan.105.167
Authors

Hiromi HISADOME, Yumiko YOSHIZAKI, Hisanori TAMAKI, WADA Koji, ITO Kiyoshi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#69
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,985
of 175,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.