↓ Skip to main content

下伊那における鳥類3種の鳴き声頻度の季節変化(短報)

Overview of attention for article published in BULLETIN OF THE IIDA CITY MUSEUM, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
下伊那における鳥類3種の鳴き声頻度の季節変化(短報)
Published in
BULLETIN OF THE IIDA CITY MUSEUM, October 2017
DOI 10.20807/icmrb.3.0_171
Authors

岸本 良輔

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE IIDA CITY MUSEUM
#5
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,863
of 332,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE IIDA CITY MUSEUM
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.