You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test (RSST) as a Screening Test of Functional Dysphagia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2490/jjrm1963.37.383 |
| Authors |
Kazuyo OGUCHI, Eiichi SAITOH, BABA Mikoto, Syoko KUSUDO, Tomomi TANAKA, Keiko ONOGI |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#6
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,135
of 109,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 41 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them