↓ Skip to main content

演者略歴一覧

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
演者略歴一覧
Published in
Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.2169/naika.106.138a
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#110
of 722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,832
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 722 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.