↓ Skip to main content

交通基本法の論点-フランスの制度とその運用をもとに

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
交通基本法の論点-フランスの制度とその運用をもとに
Published in
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, April 2017
DOI 10.20611/kotsuken.2011.28_4
Authors

板谷 和也

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
#7
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,662
of 326,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.