↓ Skip to main content

元日の喫食料理に関する地域特性の分析

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Home Economics of Japan, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 233)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
元日の喫食料理に関する地域特性の分析
Published in
Journal of Home Economics of Japan, July 2010
DOI 10.11428/jhej.58.753
Authors

名倉 秀子, 大越 ひろ, 茂木 美智子

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#47
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,941
of 103,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.