↓ Skip to main content

本邦産白亜紀アンモナイトデータベースおよび種多様性について

Overview of attention for article published in Fossils, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 116)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
本邦産白亜紀アンモナイトデータベースおよび種多様性について
Published in
Fossils, October 2017
DOI 10.14825/kaseki.68.0_14
Authors

利光 誠一, 平野 弘道, 松本 崇, 高橋 一晴

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Fossils
#26
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,913
of 333,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fossils
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.