↓ Skip to main content

Osler病様細血管拡張を伴つた先天性血管障害の1例

Overview of attention for article published in [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 720)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osler病様細血管拡張を伴つた先天性血管障害の1例
Published in
[Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, October 2008
DOI 10.11406/rinketsu.3.212
Authors

村上 元孝, 上田 好雄, 松田 保, 梅田 俊彦

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#49
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,717
of 101,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.