↓ Skip to main content

電子線ホログラフィー

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Kessho Gakkaishi, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 189)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
電子線ホログラフィー
Published in
Nihon Kessho Gakkaishi, September 2010
DOI 10.5940/jcrsj.11.23
Authors

渡辺 宏, 外村 彰

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Kessho Gakkaishi
#24
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,181
of 109,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Kessho Gakkaishi
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.