↓ Skip to main content

上院の選挙法原則・選挙方法と憲法

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 102)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
上院の選挙法原則・選挙方法と憲法
Published in
Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies, February 2017
DOI 10.14854/jaes.24.2_62
Authors

新井 誠

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies
#27
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,413
of 425,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.