↓ Skip to main content

鳥羽美鈴著, 『多様性のなかのフランス語-フランコフォニーについて考える-』, 関西学院大学研究叢書, 2012年

Overview of attention for article published in Revue de la Societe japono-francaise de Sociologie, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鳥羽美鈴著, 『多様性のなかのフランス語-フランコフォニーについて考える-』, 関西学院大学研究叢書, 2012年
Published in
Revue de la Societe japono-francaise de Sociologie, June 2017
DOI 10.20811/nichifutsusocio.23.0_75
Authors

長谷川 秀樹

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Revue de la Societe japono-francaise de Sociologie
#3
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,614
of 332,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revue de la Societe japono-francaise de Sociologie
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.