↓ Skip to main content

科学的根拠,リスク評価に基づく効果的な防虫管理

Overview of attention for article published in JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 105)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
科学的根拠,リスク評価に基づく効果的な防虫管理
Published in
JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL, May 2017
DOI 10.2524/jtappij.71.144
Authors

大庭 朋洋

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL
#10
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,096
of 325,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them