↓ Skip to main content

On the Recent Progress of the RH- and DH- Vacuum Degassing process of Molten Steel

Overview of attention for article published in Tetsu-to-Hagane, January 1977
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Recent Progress of the RH- and DH- Vacuum Degassing process of Molten Steel
Published in
Tetsu-to-Hagane, January 1977
DOI 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.63.13_1945
Authors

Hisashi MATSUNAGA, Tadao TOMINAGA, OHJI Mutsumi, Fusao TANAKA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Tetsu-to-Hagane
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,727
of 24,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tetsu-to-Hagane
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them