You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
日–東南アジア間の歴史認識をめぐる諸相
|
---|---|
Published in |
Asian Studies, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.11479/asianstudies.66.4_68 |
Authors |
大庭 三枝 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 13% |
Peru | 1 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 96% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,647,488
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies
#2
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,190
of 432,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them