↓ Skip to main content

戦後食糧輸入の定着と食生活改善(2001年度シンポジウム 日本における対外依存的穀物需給構造の形成・展開・再編)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Agricultural History, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
戦後食糧輸入の定着と食生活改善(2001年度シンポジウム 日本における対外依存的穀物需給構造の形成・展開・再編)
Published in
The Journal of Agricultural History, March 2017
DOI 10.18966/joah.36.0_10
Authors

白木沢 旭児

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Agricultural History
#6
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,563
of 324,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Agricultural History
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.