You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of two forms of radioactive particles emitted during the early stages of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station accident
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geochemical Journal, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2343/geochemj.2.0514 |
| Authors |
Yukihiko Satou, Keisuke Sueki, Kimikazu Sasa, Hideki Yoshikawa, Shigeo Nakama, Haruka Minowa, Yoshinari Abe, Izumi Nakai, Takahiro Ono, Kouji Adachi, Yasuhito Igarashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Geochemical Journal
#20
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,978
of 453,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemical Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them