↓ Skip to main content

Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
548 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s38589
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several residential aged-care facilities have replaced the institutional model of care to one that accepts person-centered care as the guiding standard of practice. This culture change is impacting the provision of aged-care services around the world. This systematic review evaluates the evidence for an impact of person-centered interventions on aged-care residents and nursing staff.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 548 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Georgia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 538 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 10%
Researcher 44 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 101 18%
Unknown 187 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 99 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 13%
Social Sciences 62 11%
Psychology 34 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 3%
Other 61 11%
Unknown 206 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,782,419
of 32,572,863 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#263
of 2,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,678
of 335,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,572,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.