↓ Skip to main content

Theorizing inconsistent media selection in the digital environment

Overview of attention for article published in The Information Society, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Theorizing inconsistent media selection in the digital environment
Published in
The Information Society, May 2021
DOI 10.1080/01972243.2021.1922565
Authors

Marco Gui, James Shanahan, Mina Tsay-Vogel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from The Information Society
#161
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,363
of 440,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Information Society
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.