↓ Skip to main content

PAX2 in human kidney malformations and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
PAX2 in human kidney malformations and disease
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00467-011-2053-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human PAX2 mutations have been associated with abnormalities in the developing and adult kidney ranging from congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) to oncogenic processes. Defining the relationship of PAX2 to human renal disease requires an appreciation of its fundamental role in renal development. Given the highly conserved nature of the PAX2 gene in vertebrates, it is not surprising that much of our understanding of PAX2 involvement in renal disease has been derived from animal models. The following review will outline the current evidence supporting involvement of PAX2 in the pathologic processes involving the kidney.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,678,432
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,263
of 3,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,020
of 240,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.