↓ Skip to main content

慢性疼痛難治例に対する段階的心身医学的治療

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 304)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
慢性疼痛難治例に対する段階的心身医学的治療
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.15064/jjpm.58.5_404
Authors

細井 昌子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,480,239
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#32
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,206
of 341,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.