↓ Skip to main content

神経性食思不振症の治療中にうっ血性心不全を併発した1症例

Overview of attention for article published in Shinzo, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
神経性食思不振症の治療中にうっ血性心不全を併発した1症例
Published in
Shinzo, July 2015
DOI 10.11281/shinzo.46.734
Authors

髙橋 徹也, 近江 晃樹, 豊島 拓, 齋藤 博樹, 桐林 伸幸, 金子 一善, 菅原 重生, 久保田 功

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Shinzo
#56
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,867
of 277,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shinzo
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.