↓ Skip to main content

愛媛県の農業用土水路における絶滅危惧種マツカサガイ残存個体群

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 202)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
77 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
愛媛県の農業用土水路における絶滅危惧種マツカサガイ残存個体群
Published in
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, October 2021
DOI 10.18960/hozen.2111
Authors

畑 啓生, 東垣 大祐, 小笠原 康太, 松本 浩司, 山本 貴仁, 村上 裕, 中島 淳, 井上 幹生

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#803,593
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#11
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,953
of 439,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.