↓ Skip to main content

Economic Statecraft: Is There a Sub-National Dimension? Evidence from United States–China Rivalry

Overview of attention for article published in World Trade Review, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic Statecraft: Is There a Sub-National Dimension? Evidence from United States–China Rivalry
Published in
World Trade Review, February 2021
DOI 10.1017/s1474745620000506
Authors

Simon J. Evenett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from World Trade Review
#133
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,952
of 418,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Trade Review
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.