↓ Skip to main content

Oseltamivir and early deterioration leading to death: A proportional mortality study for 2009A/H1N1 influenza

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 303)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
662 X users
facebook
64 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oseltamivir and early deterioration leading to death: A proportional mortality study for 2009A/H1N1 influenza
Published in
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, January 2011
DOI 10.3233/jrs-2011-0545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rokuro Hama, Mark Jones, Hiroki Okushima, Masahiro Kitao, Narumi Noda, Keiji Hayashi, Keiko Sakaguchi

Abstract

To examine the epidemiological association between sudden deterioration leading to death and Tamiflu use.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 662 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 471. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2026.
All research outputs
#73,264
of 34,567,073 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
#5
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241
of 253,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,567,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.