You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ネットオークションによる絶滅危惧魚類の取引状況と取引特性の類型化
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.2109 |
| Authors |
髙久 宏佑, 諸澤 崇裕 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 253 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 71 | 28% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 253 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#227,750
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#2
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,076
of 438,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them