↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Actual Pharmacist Research Activity at Japan Pharmaceutical Association (JPA) Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 123)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Actual Pharmacist Research Activity at Japan Pharmaceutical Association (JPA) Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science
Published in
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, March 2012
DOI 10.11256/jjdi.13.183
Authors

Takamasa Sakai, Fumiko Ohtsu, Nobuyuki Goto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,907,061
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#39
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,061
of 169,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.