You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the development status of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessments, using the IDEAL framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000088 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takeaki Ishizawa, Peter McCulloch, Derek Muehrcke, Thomas Carus, Ory Wiesel, Giovanni Dapri, Sylke Schneider-Koriath, Steven D Wexner, Mahmoud Abu-Gazala, Luigi Boni, Elisa Cassinotti, Charles Sabbagh, Ronan Cahill, Frederic Ris, Michele Carvello, Antonino Spinelli, Eric Vibert, Muga Terasawa, Mikiya Takao, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Rutger M Schols, Tim Pruimboom, Yasuo Murai, Fumihiro Matano, Michael Bouvet, Michele Diana, Norihiro Kokudo, Fernando Dip, Kevin White, Raul J Rosenthal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,302,062
of 24,124,090 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies
#11
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,372
of 429,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,124,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.