You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From the Field: Efficacy of detecting Chronic Wasting Disease via sampling hunter‐killed white‐tailed deer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[267:ftfeod]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Duane R. Diefenbach, Christopher S. Rosenberry, Robert C. Boyd |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 48% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,268,713
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#48
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,030
of 192,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#4
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.