↓ Skip to main content

イチョウイモ粘質物の組成と構造 (とくにマンナンの性状)

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon kagaku zassi, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 115)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
イチョウイモ粘質物の組成と構造 (とくにマンナンの性状)
Published in
Nippon kagaku zassi, May 2011
DOI 10.1246/nikkashi1948.88.9_982
Authors

佐藤 利夫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon kagaku zassi
#18
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,136
of 123,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon kagaku zassi
#7
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.