↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Valley-based field-effect transistors in graphene [Phys. Rev. B 86, 165411 (2012)]

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Erratum: Valley-based field-effect transistors in graphene [Phys. Rev. B 86, 165411 (2012)]
Published in
Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, January 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevb.87.039904
Authors

N.-Y. Lue, Y.-C. Chen, G. Y. Wu

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2013.
All research outputs
#9,671,255
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
#6,432
of 64,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,403
of 348,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
#77
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,917 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.