You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infection control in the intensive care unit: expert consensus statements for SARS-CoV-2 using a Delphi method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00626-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prashant Nasa, Elie Azoulay, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Jigeeshu V Divatia, Ravi Jain, Camilla Rodrigues, Victor D Rosenthal, Waleed Alhazzani, Yaseen M Arabi, Jan Bakker, Matteo Bassetti, Jan De Waele, George Dimopoulos, Bin Du, Sharon Einav, Laura Evans, Simon Finfer, Claude Guérin, Naomi E Hammond, Samir Jaber, Ruth M Kleinpell, Younsuck Koh, Marin Kollef, Mitchell M Levy, Flavia R Machado, Jordi Mancebo, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Mervyn Mer, Michael S Niederman, Paolo Pelosi, Anders Perner, John V Peter, Jason Phua, Lise Piquilloud, Mathias W Pletz, Andrew Rhodes, Marcus J Schultz, Mervyn Singer, Jéan-François Timsit, Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Jean-Louis Vincent, Tobias Welte, Sheila N Myatra |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 10% |
| United States | 10 | 8% |
| India | 7 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 26% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 22% |
| Scientists | 20 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#668,945
of 34,571,987 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,044
of 7,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,770
of 471,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#24
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,571,987 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.