↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Controlled Trial of Contingency Management for Stimulant Use in Community Mental Health Patients With Serious Mental Illness

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Psychiatry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Randomized Controlled Trial of Contingency Management for Stimulant Use in Community Mental Health Patients With Serious Mental Illness
Published in
American Journal of Psychiatry, January 2013
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11121831
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether contingency management was associated with increased abstinence from stimulant drug use in stimulant-dependent patients with serious mental illness treated in a community mental health center. Secondary objectives were to determine whether contingency management was associated with reductions in use of other substances, psychiatric symptoms, HIV risk behavior, and inpatient service utilization.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 224 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 67 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2025.
All research outputs
#1,224,094
of 31,865,747 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#925
of 8,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,697
of 328,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,865,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.