↓ Skip to main content

武田家の関口流の伝書類とその伝授の実態について―伝書類の整理と相伝階級の検討―

Overview of attention for article published in Research Journal of Budo, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 240)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
武田家の関口流の伝書類とその伝授の実態について―伝書類の整理と相伝階級の検討―
Published in
Research Journal of Budo, November 2012
DOI 10.11214/budo1968.25.2_13
Authors

和田 哲也

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Research Journal of Budo
#39
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,602
of 288,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Journal of Budo
#13
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.