| Title |
Changes in Cannabis Consumption During the Global COVID-19 Lockdown: The International COVISTRESS Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689634 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliette Salles, Antoine Yrondi, Fouad Marhar, Nicolas Andant, Raimundo Avilés Dorlhiac, Binh Quach, Jiao Jiao, Samuel Antunes, Ukadike Chris Ugbolue, Julien Guegan, Karine Rouffiac, Bruno Pereira, The COVISTRESS Network, Nicolas Andant, Maélys Clinchamps, Stéphanie Mestres, Cécile Miele, Valentin Navel, Lénise Parreira, Bruno Pereira, Karine Rouffiac, Yves Boirie Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Martine Duclos Maria Livia Fantini, Jeannot Schmidt, Stéphanie Tubert-Jeannin, Mickael Berthon, Pierre Chausse, Michael Dambrun, Sylvie Droit-Volet, Julien Guegan, Serge Guimond, Laurie Mondillon, Armelle Nugier, Pascal Huguet, Samuel Dewavrin, Fouad Marhar, Geraldine Naughton, Amanda Benson, Claus Lamm, Karen Gbaglo, Vicky Drapeau, Raimundo Avilés Dorlhiac, Benjamin Bustos, Gu Yaodong, Haifeng Zhang, Peter Dieckmann, Julien Baker, Binh Quach, Jiao Jiao, Yanping Duan, Gemma Gao, Wendy Y J Huang, Ka Lai Kelly Lau, Chun-Qing Zhang, Perluigi Cocco, Rosamaria Lecca, Monica Puligheddu, Michela Figorilli, Morteza Charkhabi, Reza Bagheri, Daniela Pfabigan, Peter Dieckmann, Samuel Antunes, David Neto, Pedro Almeida, Maria João Gouveia, Pedro Quinteiro, Constanta Urzeala, Benoit Dubuis, Juliette Lemaignen, Andy Liu, Foued Saadaoui, Ukadike Chris Ugbolue, Keri Kulik, Kuan-chou Chen, Maëlys Clinchamps, Frederic Dutheil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,992
of 10,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,814
of 436,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#523
of 753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.