↓ Skip to main content

Distinct Roles of TRP Channels in Auditory Transduction and Amplification in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distinct Roles of TRP Channels in Auditory Transduction and Amplification in Drosophila
Published in
Neuron, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.030
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Auditory receptor cells rely on mechanically gated channels to transform sound stimuli into neural activity. Several TRP channels have been implicated in Drosophila auditory transduction, but mechanistic studies have been hampered by the inability to record subthreshold signals from receptor neurons. Here, we develop a non-invasive method for measuring these signals by recording from a central neuron that is electrically coupled to a genetically defined population of auditory receptor cells. We find that the TRPN family member NompC, which is necessary for the active amplification of sound-evoked motion by the auditory organ, is not required for transduction in auditory receptor cells. Instead, NompC sensitizes the transduction complex to movement and precisely regulates the static forces on the complex. In contrast, the TRPV channels Nanchung and Inactive are required for responses to sound, suggesting they are components of the transduction complex. Thus, transduction and active amplification are genetically separable processes in Drosophila hearing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 200 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 34%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Master 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 48%
Neuroscience 44 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 38 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2026.
All research outputs
#7,618,266
of 27,887,477 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#6,080
of 9,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,631
of 299,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#62
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,887,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.