↓ Skip to main content

Spatial and Social Sexual Segregation Patterns in Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops aduncus)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spatial and Social Sexual Segregation Patterns in Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops aduncus)
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052987
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sexual segregation seems to be common in bottlenose dolphins, whereby males and females live in different pods that mix mainly for mating. Male dolphins often use aggressive behaviour to mate with females, while females with calves may have different activity and dietary requirements to males and different susceptibility to predation. We investigated the degree of spatial and social sexual segregation in Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in a subtropical estuary in Australia. Based on surveys completed over three years, dolphin groups were mostly mixed-sex or female. Mixed-sex groups were found in larger groups in mostly deeper water, whereas, female groups were foraging across all water depths in smaller groups. Aggressive coercive behaviour by males towards females was high, occurring mainly in deeper water, at higher tides, and outside the breeding season. Habitat use by female dolphin groups suggests that shallow tributaries may provide a sanctuary from aggressive males, access to suitable prey items and density for mothers and their calves, or a combination of these factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 183 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Master 26 13%
Other 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 54%
Environmental Science 32 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,600,898
of 34,351,437 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#37,866
of 224,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,991
of 347,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#809
of 5,267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,351,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.