You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A social norms approach intervention to address misperceptions of anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs amongst UK parents
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0258985 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Darel Cookson, Daniel Jolley, Robert C. Dempsey, Rachel Povey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 41% |
France | 2 | 9% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
Scientists | 8 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 17% |
Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 18 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 40 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 281. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#128,664
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,999
of 223,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,549
of 439,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#25
of 2,510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.