↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking the Phylogeny of Scleractinian Corals: A Review of Morphological and Molecular Data

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative & Comparative Biology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rethinking the Phylogeny of Scleractinian Corals: A Review of Morphological and Molecular Data
Published in
Integrative & Comparative Biology, June 2010
DOI 10.1093/icb/icq062
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Scleractinian corals, which include the architects of coral reefs, are found throughout the world's oceans and have left a rich fossil record over their 240 million year history. Their classification has been marked by confusion but recently developed molecular and morphological tools are now leading to a better understanding of the evolutionary history of this important group. Although morphological characters have been the basis of traditional classification in the group, they are relatively few in number. In addition, our current understanding of skeletal growth and homology is limited, and homoplasy is rampant, limiting the usefulness of morphological phylogenetics. Molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the order, which have been primarily focused on reef-building corals, differ significantly from traditional classification. They suggest that the group is represented by two major lineages and do not support the monophyly of traditional suborders and most traditional families. It appears that once a substantial number of azooxanthellate taxa are included in molecular phylogenetic analyses, basal relationships within the group will be clearly defined. Understanding of relationships at lower taxonomic levels will be best clarified by combined analyses of morphological and molecular characters. Molecular phylogenies are being used to inform our understanding of the evolution of morphological characters in the Scleractinia. Better understanding of the evolution of these characters will help to integrate the systematics of fossil and extant taxa. We demonstrate how the combined use of morphological and molecular tools holds great promise for ending confusion in scleractinian systematics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Brazil 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 269 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 26%
Researcher 52 18%
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 3%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 41 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 50%
Environmental Science 37 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 6%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 44 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#10,519,450
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Integrative & Comparative Biology
#876
of 1,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,109
of 152,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative & Comparative Biology
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.