↓ Skip to main content

Admission Hyperglycemia Predicts Infectious Complications After Burns

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of burn care & research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Admission Hyperglycemia Predicts Infectious Complications After Burns
Published in
Journal of burn care & research, January 2017
DOI 10.1097/bcr.0000000000000381
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inflammation and hypermetabolism post burn predisposes to hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. The authors hypothesize that admission hyperglycemia predicts infectious outcomes. A retrospective review of all patients greater than 20 years of age admitted for initial burn management from January 2008 to December 2013 was conducted. Nonthermal injuries, transfers, and those without admission glucose or histories were excluded. Hyperglycemia was defined as admission glucose ≥150 mg/dl. Patients were grouped as follows: euglycemic without diabetes (control), euglycemic with diabetes (-H+D), hyperglycemic without diabetes (+H-D), and hyperglycemic with diabetes (+H+D). Outcomes included infection, mortality, length of stay, and disposition. Comparisons were made using Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression. A total of 411 patients were analyzed. No significant differences between any of the groups and controls were noted in race, inhalation injury, or obesity. All three groups had higher mortality compared with controls. Longer hospital stays were noted only in +H-D. +H-D and +H+D were less likely to be discharged home than controls. +H-D had higher rates of bacteremia, +H-D and +H+D had higher rates of pneumonia, and -H+D and +H-D had higher rates of urinary tract infection. Regression for infection and mortality outcomes with TBSA, age, diabetes, hyperglycemia, obesity, race, gender, and inhalation injury as covariates was performed. Hyperglycemia was the only independent predictor of bacteremia (area under curve [AUC] = 0.736). Hyperglycemia was also a predictor of pneumonia and urinary tract infection (AUC = 0.766 and 0.802, respectively). The only independent predictors of mortality were age, TBSA, and inhalation injury (AUC = 0.892). Acute glucose dysregulation may be more important than diabetes in predicting infectious outcomes after burns. Therefore, admission glucose may have prognostic value.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#27,869,858
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of burn care & research
#1,334
of 2,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,448
of 463,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of burn care & research
#98
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.