You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The tundra phenology database: more than two decades of tundra phenology responses to climate change1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arctic Science (Open Access), May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1139/as-2020-0041 |
| Authors |
Janet S. Prevéy, Sarah Claire Elmendorf, Anne Bjorkman, Juha M. Alatalo, Isabel Ashton, Jakob J. Assmann, Robert G. Björk, Mats P. Björkman, Nicoletta Cannone, Michele Carbognani, Chelsea Chisholm, Karin Clark, Courtney G. Collins, Elisabeth J. Cooper, Bo Elberling, Esther R. Frei, Gregory R.H. Henry, Robert D. Hollister, Toke Thomas Høye, Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir, Jeffrey T. Kerby, Kari Klanderud, Christopher Kopp, Esther Levesque, Marguerite Mauritz, Ulf Molau, Isla H. Myers-Smith, Susan M. Natali, Steven F. Oberbauer, Zoe Panchen, Alessandro Petraglia, Eric Post, Christian Rixen, Heidi Rodenhizer, Sabine B. Rumpf, Niels Martin Schmidt, Ted Schuur, Philipp Semenchuk, Jane Griffin Smith, Katharine Suding, Ørjan Totland, Tiffany Troxler, Henrik Wahren, Jeffrey M. Welker, Sonja Wipf, Yue Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 23% |
| Canada | 6 | 13% |
| Sweden | 4 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 23 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 22 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,166,519
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Arctic Science (Open Access)
#18
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,714
of 456,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arctic Science (Open Access)
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.