Title |
Antibiotic susceptibility of Atopobium vaginae
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-6-51 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ellen De Backer, Rita Verhelst, Hans Verstraelen, Geert Claeys, Gerda Verschraegen, Marleen Temmerman, Mario Vaneechoutte |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
Researcher | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,294
of 8,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,063
of 88,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.