↓ Skip to main content

Ambulatory oxygen: why do COPD patients not use their portable systems as prescribed? A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ambulatory oxygen: why do COPD patients not use their portable systems as prescribed? A qualitative study
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-11-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 107 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Other 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,737,140
of 33,957,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#501
of 2,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,457
of 258,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,957,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.