You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in direct pharmacologic effects and antioxidative properties of mature breast milk and infant formulas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.nut.2012.07.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikoleta Lugonja, Snežana D. Spasić, Olga Laugier, Aleksandra Nikolić-Kokić, Ivan Spasojević, Zorana Oreščanin-Dušić, Miroslav M. Vrvić |
| Abstract |
Early-onset and exclusive breast-feeding provides a significant health benefit to infants compared with infant formulas. The aim of this study was to compare mature breast milk with standard infant formulas by examining their effects on non-vascular smooth muscle contraction and their antioxidative properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition
#2,174
of 3,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,910
of 291,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition
#32
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.