↓ Skip to main content

Application of stable isotope ratio analysis for biodegradation monitoring in groundwater

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of stable isotope ratio analysis for biodegradation monitoring in groundwater
Published in
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.11.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul B Hatzinger, JK Böhlke, Neil C Sturchio

Abstract

Stable isotope ratio analysis is increasingly being applied as a tool to detect, understand, and quantify biodegradation of organic and inorganic contaminants in groundwater. An important feature of this approach is that it allows degradative losses of contaminants to be distinguished from those caused by non-destructive processes such as dilution, dispersion, and sorption. Recent advances in analytical techniques, and new approaches for interpreting stable isotope data, have expanded the utility of this method while also exposing complications and ambiguities that must be considered in data interpretations. Isotopic analyses of multiple elements in a compound, and multiple compounds in the environment, are being used to distinguish biodegradative pathways by their characteristic isotope effects. Numerical models of contaminant transport, degradation pathways, and isotopic composition are improving quantitative estimates of in situ contaminant degradation rates under realistic environmental conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 26%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Chemistry 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#2,365
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,396
of 288,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.