↓ Skip to main content

Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma
Published in
Nature Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.1038/ng.2523
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary cancer of the eye and often results in fatal metastasis. Here, we describe mutations occurring exclusively at codon 625 of the SF3B1 gene, encoding splicing factor 3B subunit 1, in low-grade uveal melanomas with good prognosis. Thus, uveal melanoma is among a small group of cancers associated with SF3B1 mutations, and these mutations denote a distinct molecular subset of uveal melanomas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 247 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 24%
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Master 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 17 7%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 49 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 19%
Engineering 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 55 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,740,387
of 28,695,121 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,487
of 8,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,501
of 305,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#28
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,695,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.