You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
” 名古屋スタディ ” という疫学研究は存在しない 自由記載欄にこそある真実に目を向けるべきである
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.24698/shakairinsho.28.3_35 |
| Authors |
隈本 邦彦 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 31% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,694,620
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW
#3
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,117
of 443,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.