| Title |
Rewilding general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp21x717689 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iona Heath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 37% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,456,243
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#705
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,806
of 514,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#14
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.